Month: September 2016
Just in case anyone gets caught unawares, the UK Government’s Valuation Office Agency has published a number of new guidance documents yesterday 28th September and the new individual valuations for businesses in England and Wales are due to be published online from tomorrow 30 September 2016 and local businesses can find out what their new valuations are. The valuation is of course not necessarily the same as the business rate to be paid from 2017 which is calculated using a multiply (not yet announced?) and taking into account any reliefs etc. Nonetheless business rates are likely to be a topic of conversation in most destination in England and Wales from tomorrow onward:
Commissioned by the Local Government Association’s Culture Media & Sports Board this report/policy paper looks at recent and proposed devolution deals in England and the opportunities that devolution presents to boost the visitor economy. In doing so it highlights the importance of: tourism and the visitor economy to the UK, the critical function of destinations and destination management in supporting local businesses, the important but financially threatened role of local government in underpinning their own local destinations and their management and marketing and then discusses how devolution and the powers and funding associated with it may now help boost the visitor economy in those Cities, town, County and other areas that agree a devolution deal (as at September 2016, 6 agreed and 34 proposal being considered). See the report at:
Thanks to the Tourism Alliance for alerting me to the availability of latest PwC report Facing the future – A question of balance their UK hotel forecast for 2017. Although based largely around hotel chains and focused more towards major Cities the report contains a good deal of relevant trend analysis for all destinations and also includes interesting commentary on the potential impact on serviced accommodation of the sharing economy. Key data is at page 4, page 5 to 7 contain the main summary detail whilst the rest of the report is worth scanning if not reading in full:
Yesterday I sent out a message via blog and email regarding the English Destination Management Forum. In it I referred to the original VE DMO list and to the revised VB/VE list. I was looking at the post and I have just realized that I inadvertently attached the old randomly presented original version and not the new re ordered VB version as intended; sincere apologies.
Can you please look at the new version below and report any errors or omissions for your own destination and any potential omission for your own sub region/peer group. If you have already sent me corrections I will verify the detail against the new list for you:
I have amended the original blog and the website so it now carries both lists.
An update on the Forum and an important ask of each of the destinations in England in membership.
Those of you at the first of the VisitEngland Destinations Management Forum meetings since VB took over the mantel for England will know that there was some debate about whether to set the new Forum up as an entirely independent body not under VB/VE’s administration and therefore more easily able to lobby.
After some discussion with other existing representative bodies and VB/VE it looks increasingly likely that it has been agreed to maintain an expanded forum under the auspices of VB/VE with the forum itself setting c 50% of the agenda for each meeting. Any associated lobbying that may or may not fall out of those meeting, or occur as a consequence outside of it, will wherever possible be channeled via the existing Tourism Alliance route, specifically using the coincidental board membership of ourselves, Core Cities, TMI and a few others as the avenue of approach. This should strengthen the destination voice, not further divide it.
There is still some debate over who should chair the Forum, I and several others have indicated that a VB/VE chair is preferable. VB/VE seem to think destinations might want one of their own. A nice idea but probably fraught? I have also suggested that if neither option is workable then why not appoint someone from the industry who isn’t from a destination background and who could simply facilitate the meetings? Whatever the outcome it is hardly a deal breaker.
Meanwhile VB have taken the original published VE list of “DMO” in England which was entirely randomly presented and sorted it in to English regions and placed DMO’s in alphabetical order in each region by whatever title they had for them. The new lists confirms my original belief that there are a number of minor errors (i.e. Scarborough in the North East not Yorkshire, Redcar the other way round? Out of date organisation titles etc.), possible duplication (i.e. VisitSouthport and Sefton MBC) and far more worrying lots of potential omissions, including a number of urban and rural British Destination members. I could simply decide who is or isn’t missing but ultimately its your decision whether you want to be officially recognized as an English DMO. Being on the list, recognized and invited doesn’t mean you then have to attend the forum meetings.
Please study the list accessible below and let me have any corrections for your own entries. Since I think that making sure that the forum is truly representative from the outset is in everyone best interests, please also consider letting me have any omissions you might notice from your sub region or peer group. I will then contact them (good PR for BD) and consolidate the lot and pass it to colleagues in VE who are as keen as we are to get this right:
Revised list: destination-management-organisations-in-england
(Old original list: destination_organisations_in_england )
After a significant number of years in membership of British Destinations, providing bespoke features for British Destinations members, Trinity Mirror Solutions have withdrawn from membership for 2016/17. Consequently there will be no further specific British Destinations features offered, nor will we necessarily be highlighting other ad hoc tourism related promotional opportunities from them.
The parting, whilst regrettably, has been entirely amicable, reflecting as it does a combination of the changing nature of destination promotion, reduced individual commercial activities and the reduced joint purchasing power of the membership combined. In recognition of their long standing and loyal support to the organisation and to its individual member destinations I would urge you to continue to work with Trinity Mirror Solutions when and wherever their offering meets your needs. In that spirit I am sharing their comment (albeit later then intended) from July:
“Whilst we will not be running a British Destinations associated feature, we will be looking into new opportunities to continue support for our local/ regional tourist spots”.
“The offering has not yet been designed but we would like to continue working with local tourist boards, to help promote destinations to our audience be it through, our national or regional reach, or through print or digital platforms, that we have to offer as a Newsbrand”.
Should you have any interest in the future talking to Trinity Mirror Solutions, please do not hesitate to contact their Group Head of Travel Selina Shanker on the details below: firstname.lastname@example.org